Our earlier discussion about the sensibility of addition another SSN to the appropriations this year, and the lack of clear direction on surface fleet plans, seems to have more substantiation in the recent announcement by the Seapower Committee. Their decision to add three, not five, vessels, and the fact that these vessels will be a submarine, amphibious landing ship, and logistics support ship, indicate that the 'jury is still out' on which way to go with USN surface combatants. However, the move to add the LPD and T-AKE are sensible decisions for capability areas where the demand is unlikely to diminish no matter what shape the surface fleet eventually takes on.
You may also like
I am certainly not an expert on the joint strike fighter, so I can’t comment on the technical merits of the purchase. […]
A report in The Australian published on 8 December describes ‘a purge’ of the Royal Navy’s senior leadership over the embarrassment caused […]
Canada’s navy is on the cusp of yet another transformational moment. The government’s plan to build a modest fleet of arctic patrol […]
[*Moderator’s Note: This article was originally published on 25 April 2014 in the Halifax Herald Opinions section under the title “Dunne: Here’s […]