Social commentary around the F-35 issue is in general acceptance that they are needed, based almost exclusively on the age of the F-18s. There is an interesting comment in the paper today about the CF-18s in Libya (The Globe and Mail, “NATO split threatens Libyan effort”). Seems that the CF-18s and Tornados are particularly unsuitable for close air support to ground troops, i.e. they’re only good for bombing and departing. So again, if our future commitments are to Libyan-type conflicts where the need is for close air support, we’re buying the wrong plane.
You may also like
Commander James Kraska’s article provides an accurate description of the various legal views surrounding the maritime incident between China and the United States […]
The fall out of the recent federal election, amidst the worldwide economic swirl, opens an opportunity for the Canadian government to invest […]
Mark J. Valencia, a maritime policy analyst based in Kaneohe, Hawaii, has written an important essay that has been published on-line by […]
On February 22, 2008, the Ottawa Citizen published an anonymous letter, entitled “Navy Capabilities Slide While Government Sits Idle”, attributed to a […]